Could we have planned around the injury problem?

This is my ESPN Insider column for the week.

Back on May 11, I received a trade offer in the Tout Wars Mixed Auction league. At the end of the email, the owner added this P.S.:

I’m jealous of how healthy your roster is.

I hadn’t really thought about it at the time, but he was correct. Up to that point, my only hobbled player was Wilson Ramos, who was on the disabled list when I drafted him.

The irony was that he was inquiring about Kenta Maeda (pictured), who would hit the disabled list later that very day. But all in all, was I unusually lucky?

I don’t think so. Injury avoidance was part of my draft plan.

At RonShandler.com, I write about a program called the Broad Assessment Balance Sheet, or BABS. One of the many facets of BABS is the evaluation of talent by separating assets and liabilities, or skill and risk. BABS promotes the idea of having a “risk budget.” Depending upon the size of your league and penetration into the talent pool, this budget designates how many roster spots you can comfortably devote to risky players without negatively impacting your ability to contend.

BABS takes a different approach to injuries. We already know that as many as 50 percent of the top-ranked 300 players are going to spend some time on the DL. We cannot project which players are going to pull up lame at any time, so we have to attach some injury risk to pretty much everyone.

BABS starts by assigning a starting point for the health of each player, a minimum baseline of 25 percent odds of spending some time on the DL. To that, we add greater odds to those players with an injury history or current health concerns. Those with injury concerns are rated as having either Minor injury risk or Major injury risk. These ratings are all assigned prior to Draft Day.

Minor risk players spent more than 20 days on the DL last season or were hurt on Draft Day with a positive prognosis for the upcoming season. I gave them 26-50 percent odds of missing significant time.

Major risk players spent more than 50 days on the DL last season, spent more than 30 days on the DL in each of two consecutive seasons, or were hurt on Draft Day with uncertain or negative prognosis for the upcoming season. I gave over 50 percent odds that they would miss significant time this year.

BABS defines “significant time” as enough missed games that it hurts. If Ubaldo Jimenez goes down for two weeks with a hangnail and you replace him with Jered Weaver, that’s not significant. And if this is a real move you need to make, you have a lot more problems than worrying about injuries.

Needless to say, this is all just history. We cannot directly project future injuries from past injuries. However, research at BaseballHQ.com indicates about 40 percent odds of a player hitting the DL if he had a DL stint last year. Players with DL stints in each of the previous two years have nearly 50 percent odds of seeing the DL again this year.

Coming into this season, BABS assigned Major or Minor injury risks to 128 of the players in the NFBC’s top 300 ADP ranking list (43%). The question is, how many of this year’s hobbled players came into the season with elevated risk according to these ratings? Currently 91 of the ADP top 300 have spent at least some time on the DL. Could the BABS process have helped us avoid some of these players?

As it turns out, 45 of those 91 were rated as having some injury risk (49%). By comparison, only 83 of the remaining 209 players came into the season with injury risk (40%). It’s not a huge advantage, but those who avoided those riskier players at the draft would have been able to avoid 9% of the injuries.

Breaking it out further:

NFBC Top 300 Players Identified as Having Injury Risk on Draft Day

                                        BABS RISK RATING
                                No.     Minor      Major        Total
                               ---     -------    --------    ---------
Those who went on the DL        91     24 (26%)   21 (23%)     45 (49%)
Those who stayed off the DL    209     55 (26%)   28 (13%)     83 (40%)
TOTAL                          300     79 (26%)   49 (16%)     128 (43%)

This detail is revealing. The variance seems to be centered wholly on players with Major risk. So if you had avoided players that BABS marked as having Major injury risk, you would have had an advantage. You would have avoided players like A.J. Pollock, Trevor Story, Hunter Pence, Rich Hill, James Paxton, Aaron Nola and 14 others.

Still, all this prep would not have helped with many of this year’s critical injury losses. Madison Bumgarner, Noah Syndergaard and Freddie Freeman were players in the first two rounds who were not tagged with any elevated risk coming into the season. Similarly, closers Zach Britton, Aroldis Chapman, Mark Melancon, Jeurys Familia and Roberto Osuna were among those “healthy” players whose DL stints have thinned out the talent at an already scarce position.

So, maybe I’ve been a little bit lucky. Or, at least I was on May 11.

Since May 11, my luck has turned in the worst way. My DL list is not much longer than it was back then – Maeda is already back – but I lost my offense’s biggest gun in Freeman. Sometimes the biggest impact is not in quantity, but quality.

It goes to show that preparation can only take you so far. All it takes is one errant pitch to put an entire season at risk.

 

7 Comments

  1. david hinsdale on May 25, 2017 at 9:36 am

    I, and Freddie Freeman, feel your pain.



  2. Robert DiPietro on May 26, 2017 at 7:27 am

    I have been following the BABS plan since implementing it for all my league drafts last year and this as well. It has me in the running for money in all 4 leagues in both years. I have heavy stock in Freeman and losing him stinks. However i feel grateful enough that for the games he played that he was a great $30+ stock to have get hurt because of how well he was hitting. Ron, while BABs Was unable to foresee an injury, she was spot on with his skill assessment. Which makes me feel good about the bats i stashed from $1 late draft picks or early season sneaky FAAB bids. I really have benefited from these late rounders the past 2 years and BABS and your assessment of some players have led me to late round gold. Last year it was $1 Jose Ramirez and $1 Villar and this year was $1 Cesar Hernandez (for whom i just traded away for Dozier to the last two lace team looking to rebuild)and to a lesser extent so far Jorge Polanco.
    Keep up the fantastic work! Thanks Ron!



  3. Chad Chapman on May 26, 2017 at 1:10 pm

    I have largely avoided injury (knock on wood) save for Paxton (one of my known and embraced risks on my babs worksheet) and Keuchel and am currently in 2nd place. I Kept Trout and Votto and used Babs to identify bargains within each bracket/talent pool and it has been successful.



  4. Matthew Cederholm on May 26, 2017 at 3:09 pm

    I think the best way to view the entirety of fantasy baseball is in terms of probabilities. Freeman wasn’t guaranteed to be a top hitter because of his skills, but he was much more likely to be so than all but a handful of hitters. Tulo* wasn’t guaranteed to hit the DL just because he has every season since the shortstop was invented, but his odds were as high as almost anyone.

    Viewing each player as a set of probabilities isn’t very romantic, but it’s invaluable (funny how invaluable and valuable mean essentially the same thing in this context), and BABS really helps bring that into focus. I’m in a long-term keeper league, so I can’t always stick to the prescribed BABS limits on liabilities, but BABS allows me to weigh the risks and rewards.

    Despite currently having eight players on the DL (12-team NL only), my only significant loss has been David Dahl. That’s because most of my risky players were low-cost players with skills upside, identified through BABS.

    *Tulo probably needs his own injury risk rating. Maybe make it inj-, INJ, and TULO.



  5. David Cox on May 26, 2017 at 4:45 pm

    Ron, this is the first year that I used BABS exclusively in my 15-team keeper draft (it’s a new league this year) and it allowed me to sneak a bunch of guys through the masses… I really felt quite comfortable knowing I was going to be able to grab a similar skilled guy later on and hence could wait… bottom line, almost Memorial Day and I’m ahead with a 123 points in a 5×5… feel great about my time and while I’ve got some disappointing shortfalls from Pederson (where’s the power!), Castellanos, and Gary Sanchez – the standings are the standings… many thanks for your great site, great work and ongoing insights!

    david.



  6. shandler on May 26, 2017 at 10:43 pm

    I didn’t realize this was going to become a testimonials page, but I do appreciate hearing about all these early successes. Thanks!



  7. Brian Laing on May 28, 2017 at 1:35 pm

    I am in an NL-only league that has been going since 1986. Although I’ve never quantified DL-risky players with a numeric formula, I’ve always mentally limited taking risky players to 2 out of 18 total roster spots. (We use an 18-player roster; 11 hitters, 7 pitchers.) In the 31-year history of our league, I’ve won 5 times. This year, the two players I was willing to gamble on were David Dahl, already on DL on draft day, and Hunter Pence, who wasn’t taken until the 7th round. We keep five players each year, so Pence represents the 12th player on my 18-player roster, which made him an acceptable risk. Although I’ve been disappointed that Dahl has been out longer than anticipated, and Pence wasn’t productive before hitting the DL, I’m still fortunate enough to be in first place as we near the one-third mark of the season. So the BABS injury evaluation is an excellent addition to anyone’s pre-draft strategy.