Premonitions, and other final brain flakes
At this time of year, everyone is out with their bold predictions. For some writers, it’s an exercise in tossing spaghetti against a wall to see what sticks. At Baseball HQ, I used to conduct what I called a Longshot Caucus, which was a bit more analytically sound, linking together some conditional possibilities.
For me, it’s more personal. After more than three decades of watching hundreds of overlapping careers and trends, I see things. It’s not like Sixth Sense things (not usually, anyway; sometimes I do see careers die). It’s not as supportable as the output of a rigorously-constructed forecasting model. But often there is enough contextual or speculative noise around a potential new reality that I can’t ignore it. I think: “Nobody is projecting this but it still could happen…”
I’ll call them premonitions. Here are a bunch of them. Some you’ve heard before. Some not.
Paul Goldschmidt is the first 1Bman off the board, mostly because of his steals. As I described at the First Pitch Forum events, SBs are a product of skill and opportunity. BABS does not see the skills (and he’s continued to defy her). But this year, the opportunity may not come either. New D’backs manager, Torey Lovullo, has a minor league managerial track record of not embracing the running game. Early support: In March 2016, the D’backs stole 36 bases. Goldy had three. This year? The D’backs have stolen 21 bases. Goldy none. In fact, Goldschmidt has had at least one SB attempt in every March since he’s been in the Majors. Not this year. He is one first round player who will not return first round value this year.
At several of the First Pitch stops, I asked attendees if anyone was all-in on Clayton Kershaw. Consistently, at least half the group would raise their hands. I’m not on that bandwagon. Back issues are scary. The fact that he looked vintage after being out for two months is not convincing to me. The argument that 150 innings of Kershaw is still more valuable than 220 innings of anyone else – not convincing either. (Who is going to be backfilling those 70 innings, anyway, and how much will those innings depress the value of that roster spot?). More convincing is the fact that I asked the same question at First Pitch Los Angeles and only a smattering of hands went up. I asked why; they responded: “His back.” If hometown fans are not all-in, I’m not all-in. It was quite a feat for Kershaw to return first round value last year; his luck runs out in 2017.
Buster Posey is the first catcher off the board because he’s always been the first catcher off the board. But he was not the top earner last year. Still, everyone is drafting him first. Maybe last year was a sign that his body is wearing down. Naysayers will point to the fact that he gets some time at 1B. But maybe that’s not relevant. Jonathan Lucroy seems better positioned to claim the No. 1 spot. For my money, I have shares of Willson Contreras all over the place. Posey owners will take a loss on their investment this year.
New dad Clay Buchholz is awful. Except, if you look past 2016, you see a skill set that generated a skills-based ERA in the 3.00s for three straight years. Some players just need a change of scenery and I hear he likes cheesesteak better than baked beans.
Here are the home run career years (majors and minors) for key Rockies’ players. Asterisked totals were put up in partial seasons: Charlie Blackmon (29), Nolan Arenado (42), Carlos Gonzalez (40), Trevor Story (27*), David Dahl (25*), Mark Reynolds (44), Tommy Murphy (24), Ian Desmond (25). “Once you display a skill, you own it.” That’s 200-plus HR potential from just eight players. If new manager Bud Black, who knows pitching, can figure out Coors Field for his staff, this team could make a run for the division title.
Mark Reynolds, 20+ HRs. Skill meets opportunity meets desperation.
Dexter Fowler has consistently fallen short of my expectations. When he was in Colorado, I projected BIG things. He didn’t come through. I believe St. Louis is the type of club that can get the best out of him. He’ll be the lead-off hitter on my Scoresheet team and, while the Cardinals probably still won’t run much, he should pace the team in bags.
Hedging and hoping, hedging and hoping. That’s what we’ve been doing all month when it comes to David Price. Enough already. Would someone take a stand? Look at the data. What are the odds? Play those odds. Here, watch: Price will spend more time on the DL then on the Red Sox this year. And this is coming from someone who has Price as his anchor starter in the FSTA experts league (that drafted back in January).
Biggest disappointment this year? Cleveland. Kipnis hurt. Brantley, Salazar and Carrasco always hurt. Encarnacion letdown. Chisenhall? Austin Jackson?? Post-Series psychological letdown. Biggest short-term surprise? Minnesota. Consider our opinions one year ago about Tyler Duffey, Jose Berrios and Byung Ho Park (pictured). Yes, 2016 was a disaster but their skills just didn’t disappear.
Buy Aaron Hicks. That Yankees outfield is an injury waiting to happen.
Spring training stats don’t mean much to me, other than identifying hurt players who might be healthy. As such, these are the only players for whom their March numbers will have me bidding an extra buck: Brandon Drury, Alex Gordon, Chris Owings and David Peralta. Notice something here? If not for their disaster of a pitching staff, I would definitely be betting the over on Arizona wins (current line at 78.5).
Speaking of betting, I’ve been pretty up front about not possessing the gambling gene. I’ve also never placed a sportsbook bet, mostly because I thought it might compromise the objectivity of my writing. But at this point of my career, if you don’t trust me by now, there is nothing I can really do about it. So this year, I am putting money down here:
Atlanta – 74.5 OVER
Colorado – 80.5 OVER
Detroit – 82.5 OVER
LA Angels – 79.5 UNDER
LA Dodgers – 94 UNDER
St Louis – 84.5 OVER
These are not touts. This is just me telling you what I am doing.
Some might think this makes me a hypocrite in that I often diss DFS. But that’s a different game. There, it’s only gambling if you enter tournaments without using an advanced analytical model and submit fewer than 500 lineups. Otherwise, it’s clearly a game of skill. And perfectly legal.
The final BABS Master List is now posted here. Good luck this weekend.
Thanks, Ron. I truly enjoy your articles.
Mark
Thanks, Ron! Final thoughts … just in time for my big draft
tonight 🙂
Vintage Ron Shandler. Great insights communicated by a terrific writer.
Good stuff. Very happy with my roster coming out of my draft last night using BABS.
Great stuff as always, Ron. Congrats on a great off-season. Was wondering if there’s anything as far as a guide to using this site in season?
Thanks to all these nice comments. During the season, I’ll continue to post articles 1-2 times per week, there will be updated in-season lists with current BABS ratings, the forums will always be open, and if time permits, I have a few other surprises up my sleeve.
Goldschmidt has been overrated in my view, BUT he is more than SB. I have played Scoresheet for years. At the NY/Jorsey 1st pitch, you made your Goldschmidt presentation, and I mentioned that Paul had a .411 OBP last year. That is ELITE in any league. Back when the recent Phillies were good ,
the Rockies had their # in the playoffs. You might be on to something. PLAY BALL !!!
Ron,
Was waiting and hoping an article like this would appear. Right or Wrong, premonitions are a good thing!
I’m glad to see that you finally “loosened-up” in your old age, and dropped a couple of george washington’s on some over unders this season. Did you use BABS at all for your Over/Under picks (last year you did a BABS predicts the divisions and playoffs, forgot how those picks did), but just wondered if that was the foundation behind your bets, or you just bellied up to the betting counter, and used some good old “gut instinct”?
Now, if you can come up with another article were you talked to the “old man” about his draft, and he told you he took Pujols in the 1st round, that would be magic all over again, but even a reprint of that original piece from last year would be nice. It’s so good to have a big hearty laugh, after all this stressful drafting/auction stuff. Thanks again, Ron.
I was at the NY/NJ confab. Todd Zola was heard to utter the pro Kershaw remark (off stage) – only he suggested 170 innings.
Love the article. Drury has been a guy I am targeting under the radar to fill out my roster for a while (Love Gordon too, but I am in Nebraska (where he is from) and in a league with 5 rabid Royals fans (so the extra $ will be in a higher range than I am willing to pay).
Please elaborate on Encarnacion. I am considering him as one of my big ticket items in my auction tomorrow, but your comments about the Indians (and a letdown for him) spooked me a bit. Your thoughts are greatly appreciated!!!
Mostly gut. I plan to do a more rigorous assessment of the teams using BABS for some articles this coming week, but I knew I wouldn’t get them done before I had to play those bets so I just scanned each team’s depth charts.
For the “old man” article, click on ARTICLES and do a search for “curmudgeon.”
Tough to elaborate on gut. As I noted, this is just a sense I get after watching players for decades. Oftentimes, high-end talents will see a letdown when moving to a new team, new environment, new culture. EE seems like a prime candidate here.
With the DFS comment, which I also see as gambling, do you mean 500 lineups per day or 500 over any period of time, like a season. Btw, I used to do quite well with the Forecaster, picking power hitters and guys from the same team on the old Draftstreet site against 200 people or so. Now I can’t win anything against the big universe on the big sites. Imagine if you were playing poker, and there was a way for Phil Helmuth to participate in every game at once. That’s what I worry about there. If the game was against people in my county (like a local poker game) I’d like to do it again, but as it is now, it seems to be mostly a waste of money. Maybe as small sites pop up that are not worth the time of the experts, I’ll get interested again.
My (essentially) tongue-in-cheek comment was intended to mean 500 lineups per day. But really, that’s what you’d need to compete on a level playing field. It sounds like you already figured that out.